Search engines are biased. They prefer human-generated content. With Google’s March 2025 Helpful Content upgrade, pages that appear to have been created automatically are quickly detected. And once that happens, they basically get pushed into search result no-man’s land. Platforms used by publishers and marketers benefit from watermarks from OpenAI and other organizations. If you’re putting out the same boilerplate as everyone else, the algorithms pick up on it, causing your reach and backlinks to pay the price.

Legal audiences set a high standard. Those in positions to make important decisions, such as General Counsel, claims adjusters, and knowledgeable clients, appreciate clear citations, a calm tone, and some courtroom experience. AI is capable of rephrasing case law, but it has no idea why, in a waterfront cargo dispute, forum non conveniens made more sense than arbitration. What actually turns a reader into someone who picks up the phone is the decision you make in the moment—the strategy you choose, your read on the risks, even your sense of the judge’s personality. Humans bring judgment to that Machine’s just spit back language.

We’re already seeing the difference show up in real ways. Schools run student essays through GPTZero, and plenty of publishers get wary when a piece scores over 20% on the AI scale. Businesses screen external warnings in a similar manner out of concern for accusations of plagiarism or the damage that boilerplate counsel may do to their reputation. If a memo gets flagged, it never reaches the C-suite. Once a memo shows up in red, it’s basically dead on arrival. Executives never see it. It’s a good reminder that real, original thinking is what actually connects with people.

Businesses that allow actual people to oversee their material eventually stand out from the crowd. Although a 600-word piece based on a brief interview with a partner won’t appear on as many screens as an automatically generated FAQ, those who do read it tend to stay on the page longer. They do not bounce as much. More people share it. Additionally, Google interprets small human details, such as specific docket numbers or local regulations known only to practitioners in your area, as real “information gain”. At that point, prospects begin to pay notice, and your rankings begin to rise. They also make calls.

Think of AI as a useful junior researcher rather than your ghostwriter. Spend some time double-checking everything it offers. An attorney or writer with JD training can mold the narrative, add subtlety, and outline the reader’s next course of action. They will take their knowledge, shape the story, add nuance, and embed the next steps readers need to follow. They’ll make sure the content is correct, makes sense to real people, and doesn’t break any of the Model Rules. Then they review the final version to confirm it includes the essentials—the correct info, a byline, a bar number, and a disclaimer. Stuff a machine wouldn’t think twice about.

Over time, readers reward such accountability, and search engines follow suit. Attention is limited in a time of limitless content. That limited resource is earned through human-led writing that demonstrates judgment, locality, and lived experience. The companies that invest in a real, authentic voice now are the ones who will end up winning the rankings and recommendations later. Meanwhile, all of the auto-generated AI content just fades into the background with the rest of the ignored pages, and sometimes even gets hit with penalties for bad or sloppy info.

Every time an algorithm tightens its standards, the gap between real content and spam only gets bigger. Maintain a high standard for your clients by avoiding overly formal language and giving all of your writing a personal voice.